<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Final Tag - Latest Comments in Are you (time) rich or (time) poor?</title><link>http://finaltag.disqus.com/</link><description>Discussing E-Business 2.1</description><atom:link href="https://finaltag.disqus.com/are_you_time_rich_or_time_poor/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 12:15:27 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Are you (time) rich or (time) poor?</title><link>http://finaltag.com/2007/03/20/are-you-time-rich-or-time-poor/#comment-3080532</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hey Mark!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Akismet thinks you're a spammer! :S Just de-marked the post from the "spam caught by akismet".&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I agree with you, there have always been "time rich" and "time poor" consumers. but the way this article sheds light on how online marketers can use this classification to their advantage was something I thought was very cool.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Pranav Chavda</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 12:15:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Are you (time) rich or (time) poor?</title><link>http://finaltag.com/2007/03/20/are-you-time-rich-or-time-poor/#comment-3080533</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hey there Pranav - Been a while since I was able to get over here... but, as always, you are putting up good content.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I think this article is alright, nothing stellar when it comes to the two different type of people Time rich vs. Time poor - however, I did find it interesting when they tried to quantify which types of sites would be of interest to the two different categories of people.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark from Bloglyne.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 10:03:30 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>