<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Final Tag - Latest Comments in To Google: Tamil, etc aren&amp;#8217;t &amp;#8220;Indic languages&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://finaltag.disqus.com/</link><description>Discussing E-Business 2.1</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 16:54:27 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: To Google: Tamil, etc aren&amp;#8217;t &amp;#8220;Indic languages&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://finaltag.com/2008/05/07/to-google-tamil-etc-arent-indic-languages/#comment-819496</link><description>I wouldn't say it's a "race", more like a linguistic group. There isn't such a thing as an aryan race.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">pranavchavda</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 16:54:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: To Google: Tamil, etc aren&amp;#8217;t &amp;#8220;Indic languages&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://finaltag.com/2008/05/07/to-google-tamil-etc-arent-indic-languages/#comment-780081</link><description>nice view on the origins of the aryan race:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.think-israel.org/girishkumar.aryanrace.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.think-israel.org/girishkumar.aryanra...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">anonymous</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 05:33:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: To Google: Tamil, etc aren&amp;#8217;t &amp;#8220;Indic languages&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://finaltag.com/2008/05/07/to-google-tamil-etc-arent-indic-languages/#comment-578608</link><description>I din't say south Indian languages are not Indian. How absurd!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;All I am saying is that these are not indic, meaning that these are &lt;br&gt;ancient languages but aren't branches or sub-branches of sanskrit and &lt;br&gt;it's prakrits or other indo-european languages. I know that tamil is THE &lt;br&gt;oldest language of India, but that doesn't make it Indic - mainly &lt;br&gt;because it's not sanskrit, nor is it derived from sanskrit or written in &lt;br&gt;a way that sanskrit is.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;For the record, I am neither a speaker of Hindi nor of south Indian &lt;br&gt;languages. It's just the way google has classified these languages is &lt;br&gt;incorrect and I was pointing that out.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">pranavchavda</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 09:01:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: To Google: Tamil, etc aren&amp;#8217;t &amp;#8220;Indic languages&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://finaltag.com/2008/05/07/to-google-tamil-etc-arent-indic-languages/#comment-578319</link><description>For us, the people from south, Hindi itself is not a Indian language. We consider Sanskrit as Indian language spoken by people north of vindhya.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;First understand that Hindi is a regional language of UP, Bihar and MP which replaced one of the sacred language of india. Sanskrit in those regions.&lt;br&gt;Come little outside these states, you will not find hindi. Dont drag the prakrits to support you. Understand that your hindi speaking people are also minorities. Those people speaking marathi, gujarati, bengali and punjabi have to be blamed for not being proud about their language. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Our Tamil, Telugu, Malayalam and Kannada is older than your hindi boss ! and more phonetic than your hindi. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Dont impose regionalism on us.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;To unite as nation, we need in unity in diversity.  India doesnt need one language to unite the country. It will be united by all the language. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;India doesnt need the talk of which language is superior, which language is indic kind of arguments.  So please remove this post or get a life.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Proud Indian From South</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 07:37:48 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>